Well, although it's been a while in coming, I'd like to begin on the long awaited "Newsman Investigation". I have been scouring through old posts that the Chief Instigator has made, and have found a few items of interest. :lol: Although I will say that I don't expect any of this info to be news to the members of this great board, I feel that it will be beneficial to bring some of these antics to the forefront of our collective memories.
Let me start by apologizing for the amount of time this has taken and the length of this post. I have started this investigation a little behind the ball, as I am a relatively new member and apparently Sir John has been working his mayhem for several years. The search button has been my close companion for this endeavor. NOTE TO SIR JOHN- PLEASE HOLD ANY REBUTLE COMMENTS UNTIL THE APPROPRIATE TIME TO PUT THOSE FORTH- AFTER YOUR DASTARDLY DEEDS ARE LAID BARE. :lol: :lol:
Without further ado, I take you to the beginning of this investigation, the "Singles thread/ re" Safety and Single Women". In a post dated February 07, 2007, Sir John, hereafter refered to as the Defendant, did openly demonstrate his admiration with the following statement- "Wow! What a woman!" - in reference to Lady alohilani.
In a slightly earlier post on the same thread, he recommended Mace for a lady to carry, causing some suspicion that he could testify to it's usefulness, having been a victim of it in the past,. :lol: Then, on February 14,2007, in the same thread, in a post immeadiatly following Lady Elona's post, he states, "There's hope for you, yet! " Note: this may or may not have been in response to said Lady's post I submit to you that this would be known as leading one on.
Apparently, THE DEFENDANT felt quite comfortable in this thread, as a few posts later, dated February 22,2007, we find him singing a love song in reference to Lady Alohilana's avatar directly quoted-- "Hmmm, reminds me of a song (hold your ears) -It's a lover's question, and I'd like to know-uh-uh-o-ooo-ee-ooh! "
He then accidently admits that he is shopping for a wife- again, direct quote here "It wasn't me! It wasn't! I'm tellin' ya, it was that other guy! I..wha? oh, umm, never mind "
John
(In response to the following comment from: RainbowJingles on July 05, 2007, 05:13:57 PM
I overheard a guy (well beyond his 30's) who has recently signed up for a membership on an apostolic singles website tell someone that he's getting flack from some of his elders for "trying to find a wife on the Internet."
I submit that this shows that Newsman's intents are obviously not that of an INNOCENT, IMPARTIAL correspondant as he tries to portray. :lol:
Speaking of impartial, in the "Ask a Grump thread" , he admits that he thrives on "
Taking the words and applying them to the context that most fits what I want to say!" This is a clear admittance that he twists and fabricates others' innocent comments to make them less innocent. :biglaugh:
MORE TO FOLLOW, WE'RE JUST GETTING STARTED- THREE MORE YEARS' OF POST TO WADE THROUGH. :laughhard:
Hahaha!
*rWooby sits on the edge of her chair and gleefully watches the fun begin*
:beret:
At our last meeting, dear jury, I endeavored to demonstrate the true character and methods of manipulation of THE DEFENDANT. With your kind permission, I shall continue to point out instances that TRUTHFULLY demonstrate these traits. :thumbsup2:
In a rather telling instance dated August 10,2007, (Ask a Grump thread) THE DEFENDANT responded to an innocent question by Lady "Succulant Peach " Mel quite unkindly. Lady Mel had innocently asked when his fictional wife might join us here on GP. THE DEFENDANT responded snappishly "Not until after she fixes me dinner!" :nono: This would lead one to belive that he suscribes to the old line of thought that a lady's position is in the kitchen- probably barefoot, as well. This is simply intolerable in this day and age, unless it is the lady's choice to remain in such a state.
In the same thread, THE DEFENDANT was asked what it would take to make a grump not a grump. Lady Mel answered " A good woman, and a mallet!". THE DEFENDANT'S lack of denial is telling, as he did not responded for several posts, and then only with a "grump, grump, grump".
In the same thread, THE DEFENDANT admits to being lazy. When asked what caused him to seek a career in broadcasting, he responded " Didn't want to actually have to work" (June 26,2007). Obviously our brother hath forgotten the wisdom of 2nd Thessalonians 3 :10 " For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat"
In the spirit of brotherhood we should pray for our brother in this fault, (Galatians 6:1- "Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.")
In addition to the above instances, THE DEFENDANT also claims "I also tell people that, not only am I a jerk, but I'm a CONSISTENT jerk!" I will have to say, differences not withstanding, I would not have considered Sir John a jerk, but he is hoisted upon his own petard, and convicted with his own words. :angel3
There is evidence that THE DEFENDANT did indeed become somewhat twitterpated with Lady Mary, as evidenced in " The journey- watch for updates" thread ( August 22, 2007) . He became hot and bothered, proclaiming publically that Lady Mary was hot - direct quote- "(I told Mary so, too, so it's no news to her, and she agreed totally,) she is HOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" He then confirms his twitterpatedness by stating a short time later that "Mary is an amazing woman!" Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, in the words and spirit of THE DEFENDANT, can we all say " Oooohhhh LaLa"?
I leave you with this, that you might reflect upon it... Ask a Grump thread, his own words- "Yes, just about got too hot before I realized it...." :laughhard: * *NOTE: While all information is reliable and personally guarunteed to exist , some posts may have not been recounted in chronological order. This obviously has no bearing in the truthfulness of this report ** . Signed, THE PROSECUTOR
/me pulls up a chair beside rWooby and also waits for more.
:popcorn:
As attorney for the defendant and Supreme Court Chief Justice I am very sure that and appropriate plea bargain can be arranged!
Quote from: Scott on November 10, 2010, 06:22:42 AM
As attorney for the defendant and Supreme Court Chief Justice I am very sure that and appropriate plea bargain can be arranged!
Hmmmm..... apparently it would be appropriate to ask for a change in venue, as the jobs of defense attorney and Supreme Court Chief Justice clearly are conflicts of interest. :lol: Failing that, your honor, the people
would consider a plea bargain, in the interest of justice.
We would be willing to settle for THE DEFENDANT admitting in this public forum that he is not the innocent,loving and dedicated man of honor that he claims to be. Further, we move that he would be forbidden to ever use the word "innocent" or any of its synonyms in connection with himself, including the title he has stolen, "IBOB".
Lastly, due to the amount of time that he has been preying upon the truely innocent, he should be required to have the tag line "NOT INNOCENT OF ANYTHING, FORMERLY KNOWN AS IBOB" prominately displayed upon all posts. This is requested not as punishment for THE DEFENDANT, rather as a public service warning for all innocent passerby , warning of the snake in the grass known as THE DEFENDANT.
Failing the acceptance of these terms, we are ready to continue to trial, and indeed will continue to work towards that end.
Sincerely, THE PROSECUTOR. :laughhard:
Change of Venue Denied!
The defendant is an employee of the court and therefore this court has full venue, jurisdiction and denies any appeal and the decision of this court is final.
It is my understanding that the individual commonly known has ''Five-oh" is a police officer and after checking the constitutional guidelines for this jurisdiction, nothing has been noted granting prosecution rights to the police department. The Job of the police department is to respond, investigate and present evidence to the city attorney if the crime is not a felony and to the county if the crime is a felony. It is then the CA or DA's job to prosecute.
However: The judge is this matter is not opposed to receiving bribes........
Your honor,
While it is true that the prosecutor of this matter is indeed a police officer , there comes a time in which public safety has to take priority over minor jurisdictional squabbles. As there has been no prosecutor appointed at this time, I have felt the need to assume this heavy burden. This was done, not with the intent of unsurping any of this court's power, but again in the interest of public safety.
In this case, the conduct of THE DEFENDANT has been so blatent and unchecked for so long, it is felt by some that it could indeed rise to the felony level. I would not be opposed to the appointment of a special prosecutor, were one found that was not partial to the defendant. Perhaps Minnesota68? Provided of course that he would be granted the leeway to testify as well.
Barring this, in interest of peace, harmony, and JUSTICE, I humbly request that the court overlook and laspes in proper protocol, as it was not done maliciously ( unlike many of THE DEFENDANT'S actions), and appoint me as special prosecutor for this case only.
Sincerely, the lowly overworked, underpaid, unappreciated, guardian of truth and justice, "five-oh"
In reference to the bribery, - what's your price? :laughhard:
Maybe cheesepuff can be the prosecutor or is it persecutor? ( I can never get it right)
What say ye, Cheesie? I'll do all the work and continue to lay out the many indescretions of THE DEFENDANT. All you'll have to do is pop in and mutter "Weirdo" at THE DEFENDANT every once in a while, and collect admiration of being the persecuting prosecutor. :biglaugh:
*rWooby firmly squelches a howl of laughter*
:beret:
*awaits the end of the alleged prosecutor's case, and respondent will argue venue, jurisdiction, conflict of interest, abuse of authority under color, of law, comspiracy, prosecutorial misconduct, and more, specifically related to one "five-oh', address other co-conspirators, request indictments against all of same, and refute unfounded charges against respondent, with such response being filed in the court of public opinion within a fortnight of when five-oh (and his silent co-conspirators) announces he rests what he laughingly has called his 'case'*
John/IBOB :waving:
Grumpyest of Grumpye
Champion of the Elder Bachelors' Council
Innocent Bachelor of Broadcasting
:laughhard:
C'mon, Sir John! Take 'em on!
*chortles with glee*
*passes more :popcorn: to Mel*
:beret:
Hey Lady Ruby! I had hoped for at least neutrality from you if not your endorsement of the FACTS. :lol: I see upon whose side you will land. :nono:
Oh, and just a note to the co-conspiritors- I'm feelin' kinda like Ray Stevens in the "Blue Cyclone" song- :sing: " You see them two big dudes over there? The cyclone looked and said "Over where?" I turned around and sonuvagun, they's GONE!" :laughhard: Feel free to jump in here and help me out! directed at Taco, Mini, and Yoop, especially!
:violin:
:guitar:
:moped: :copcar:
This thread just seemed like it needed some dramatic music and chase scene. LOL
:pound: At the risk of incriminating myself, if you don't help out as agreed, you better soup up that bad motorscooter. :lol: Scott'll leave the cop car unattended, and I will be in HOT PURSUIT of you! :laughhard:
Quote from: Scott on November 10, 2010, 05:34:24 PM
Maybe cheesepuff can be the prosecutor or is it persecutor? ( I can never get it right)
Quote from: Scott on November 10, 2010, 06:22:42 AM
As attorney for the defendant and Supreme Court Chief Justice I am very sure that and appropriate plea bargain can be arranged!
(Since Five-Oh seems out numbered and wont stop begging for help.)
Your Honorable Chief Justice,
Since the Supreme court is primarily an appellate court and a case can only reach the Supreme Court upon appeal it would appear that you as Supreme Court Chief Justice are bypassing the law and all lower courts by ruling over this case. Also as a Supreme Court Chief Justice you should know more than anyone that no ruling can be made by a single justice. Who are your fellow justices on this court?
We request that you step down as Judge in this case and allow Cheesehead or The Ancient One(Sis) to rule over this matter. We have no objection to you staying on as the defense attorney.
(What can I say I feel sorry for Five-oh, fighting a losing cause.)
Quote from: five-oh on November 10, 2010, 11:36:40 PM
Hey Lady Ruby! I had hoped for at least neutrality from you if not your endorsement of the FACTS. :lol: I see upon whose side you will land. :nono:
Oh, and just a note to the co-conspiritors- I'm feelin' kinda like Ray Stevens in the "Blue Cyclone" song- :sing: " You see them two big dudes over there? The cyclone looked and said "Over where?" I turned around and sonuvagun, they's GONE!" :laughhard: Feel free to jump in here and help me out! directed at Taco, Mini, and Yoop, especially!
Quote from: five-oh on November 10, 2010, 11:46:37 PM
:pound: At the risk of incriminating myself, if you don't help out as agreed, you better soup up that bad motorscooter. :lol: Scott'll leave the cop car unattended, and I will be in HOT PURSUIT of you! :laughhard:
Taco, taco, taco- It is not a lost cause. :nono: For even if the case were to be lost, the true nature of THE DEFENDANT will have came out. He will know, deep in his heart, that he has been caught and that knowledge may temper his actions. As a wise old sergeant I worked with once said, " An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." :teeth:
Having said that, I feel confident that the most Supreme Pontiff, AKA Scott, will be a wise man and will allow for this investigation/trial to continue in the interest of justice. I also firmly believe, that, while THE DEFENDANT might be able to provide excuses for some of his actions, and might sway a few persons, he will be found unable to excuse away all of his trespasses and will ultimately be found Guilty of concealing his true nature.
Having said all of that, I propose at least a pound of prevention, given THE DEFENDANT'S aforementioned antics.
In my humble opinion... methinks that to have a monitor... who is a co-worker of the defendant... as the persecuting prosecutor... might not produce the best unbiased trial...
You all are much better at the technical writing than I am... lol.
Quote from: taco_harvell on November 11, 2010, 12:15:35 AM
(Since Five-Oh seems out numbered and wont stop begging for help.)
Your Honorable Chief Justice,
Since the Supreme court is primarily an appellate court and a case can only reach the Supreme Court upon appeal it would appear that you as Supreme Court Chief Justice are bypassing the law and all lower courts by ruling over this case. Also as a Supreme Court Chief Justice you should know more than anyone that no ruling can be made by a single justice. Who are your fellow justices on this court?
We request that you step down as Judge in this case and allow Cheesehead or The Ancient One(Sis) to rule over this matter. We have no objection to you staying on as the defense attorney.
(What can I say I feel sorry for Five-oh, fighting a losing cause.)
*shrug*
You do not want Seth ruling over this, John would get the death penalty and Sis would fall asleep and think she was at a bingo parlor. It is embarrassing enough that she screams bingo during sermons at church.
As for me stepping down?
You did notice my Title ''Caring Concerned Dictator"?
Quote from: Scott on November 11, 2010, 06:59:19 AM
Quote from: taco_harvell on November 11, 2010, 12:15:35 AM
(Since Five-Oh seems out numbered and wont stop begging for help.)
Your Honorable Chief Justice,
Since the Supreme court is primarily an appellate court and a case can only reach the Supreme Court upon appeal it would appear that you as Supreme Court Chief Justice are bypassing the law and all lower courts by ruling over this case. Also as a Supreme Court Chief Justice you should know more than anyone that no ruling can be made by a single justice. Who are your fellow justices on this court?
We request that you step down as Judge in this case and allow Cheesehead or The Ancient One(Sis) to rule over this matter. We have no objection to you staying on as the defense attorney.
(What can I say I feel sorry for Five-oh, fighting a losing cause.)
*shrug*
You do not want Seth ruling over this, John would get the death penalty and Sis would fall asleep and think she was at a bingo parlor. It is embarrassing enough that she screams bingo during sermons at church.
As for me stepping down?
You did notice my Title ''Caring Concerned Dictator"?
:laughhard: :laughhard: :laughhard: :laughhard: Gotta give you that one, oh completely unbiased one. If it's alright with you, I'll try to continue with the facts sometime tomorrow, regardless of the fact that I seem to be :frustrated:. You can rule on the propriety of my actions later- after all, you're actually the only one I have to convince. And you've never gotten back to me with a price vis-a-vis bribery. :lol:
I don't play bingo. I don't fall asleep during exciting things like trials. Have never fallen asleep watching L & O! HUMPH!!!
Weirdos.
Quote from: Sis on November 11, 2010, 07:35:36 AM
I don't play bingo. I don't fall asleep during exciting things like trials. Have never fallen asleep watching L & O! HUMPH!!!
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
(Hamlet, Act 3, scene 2, line 254)
Methinks not enough. I have other problems. Don't give me any more, please.
Ok, after a bit of being sidelined with minor jurisdictional issues, I have once more began work on the "Newsman" matter. I shall endeavor to provide you with all of the incriminating evidence possible, although I may require a little more time for this case than I had originally planned, due to the overwhelming amount of said evidence.
Speaking of this case, it seems that THE DEFENDANT may have had a premonition that eventually justice would catch up with him. In the " Nunya Business w/SippinTea " thread ( September 18, 2007), he speaks resignedly with this statement- "Nay, there is no defense against the truth."
I should like to take this opportunity, Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, to remind THE DEFENDANT of this statement and of the previously extended offer of settlement. In the interest of justice, we would be pleased to accept a negotiated plea of the inevitable. :lol:
**Until I have received an acceptance of this offer, we shall continue with the investigation.**
We find that in this thread a wealth of evidence of THE DEFENDANT'S misconduct. For example, apparently THE DEFENDANT experienced a few days of slight infatuation with Lady Ruby, who we've recently found has many aliases (example- "Snoogy"), as numerous times in said thread he refers to Lady Ruby as "Dahling".
Then, on December 19, 2007 in the same thread he rather coldly admits that he is quite the playa *direct quote here*- "Ah, but I'm wise in the ways of women".
A short time later, on January 8, 2008, in a welcome thread, THE DEFENDANT , to his credit, does indeed warn a newcomer of his snake-in-the-grass tactics, in as clear an admittance of guilt in reference to his manipulating ways that anyone could hope for- again, *direct quote here* " I have been known to quote and misquote on occasions (generally, but not exclusively limited to; Monday though Friday, weekends, and holidays!)"
Once again, premonition was at work for THE DEFENDANT on February 2,2008, he forsees the Chicken King's infatuation with Lady Mel and quickly steps in to place his brand on Lady Mel- Quote-" As to the culinary attributes of the fruits involved, I do not care for seth at all, and like succulent peaches very well."
As I do not wish to tire or bore my distingushed jurors (somebody wake up Sis, aka the ancient wise one), I will close for the evening, and wish you all a good night.
:waving: :waving:
LOL! :laughhard:
Awesome...!
Sorry, when you said 'the ancient wise one' 'Morla, the ancient One' - Neverending Story, popped into my head.
*coninues to watch thread with interest* :popcorn:
Quote from: upcchris on November 17, 2010, 02:34:26 AM
Sorry, when you said 'the ancient wise one' 'Morla, the ancient One' - Neverending Story, popped into my head.
*coninues to watch thread with interest* :popcorn:
Well... There is one of two plausible explanations... Either they are twin sisters... Or like Seth... Sis has an alter-ego! Lol
:lol: You better hope Sis doesn't know who Morla, the ancient one is or we might both get clobbered! :couch:
Quote from: upcchris on November 18, 2010, 06:19:27 AM
:lol: You better hope Sis doesn't know who Morla, the ancient one is or we might both get clobbered! :couch:
:laughhard: Ahh... nonsense! I would just call Falkor to come rescue us! But don't expect me to sing "A Whole New World" to you as we fly away... It is way to high of a key for my Bass voice! :biglaugh:
Dear Newsman...
I don't care what they say, I still think you are an awesome dude, and one of the best examples of a Gentleman that I have seen in a long time! Thank you for being who you are! :grin: Even if it means you pick on me at times, I know that you are not malicious in your teasing.
You have made my day brighter many times from the Yankee Bear series, and even the investigations.
Thank you for being you!
~ Chel
Quote from: sunlight on November 18, 2010, 06:54:31 AM
Dear Newsman...
I don't care what they say, I still think you are an awesome dude, and one of the best examples of a Gentleman that I have seen in a long time! Thank you for being who you are! :grin: Even if it means you pick on me at times, I know that you are not malicious in your teasing.
You have made my day brighter many times from the Yankee Bear series, and even the investigations.
Thank you for being you!
~ Chel
I *think* she was paid to say that... or was offered to be featured in less of his *future* investigations... :laughhard: Now back to our investigation of Newsman... :P
Quote from: sunlight on November 18, 2010, 06:54:31 AM
Dear Newsman...
I don't care what they say, I still think you are an awesome dude, and one of the best examples of a Gentleman that I have seen in a long time! Thank you for being who you are! :grin: Even if it means you pick on me at times, I know that you are not malicious in your teasing.
You have made my day brighter many times from the Yankee Bear series, and even the investigations.
Thank you for being you!
~ Chel
Dear misguided, paid advertiser- We all agree that he is an awesome dude. We are just enjoying exposing some of his- uhhh, quirks. :biglaugh:
Hmm... One thing I learned in photography is that once an image is exposed... to bring more light to the subject creates problems with overexposure, and causes the image to appear unlike the original- so much so, you can't see what it really is in the rendition that you create.
:grin: I will leave you to ponder if this comment is related or not. :evilgrin:
Quote from: sunlight on November 18, 2010, 01:27:13 PM
Hmm... One thing I learned in photography is that once an image is exposed... to bring more light to the subject creates problems with overexposure, and causes the image to appear unlike the original- so much so, you can't see what it really is in the rendition that you create.
:grin: I will leave you to ponder if this comment is related or not. :evilgrin:
Now you've got me worried. :lol: What kind of evil Frankenstein will Newsman morph into? And will everyone blame me? (probably). Will Scott banish me for overexposing John? Hmmm.... Things to ponder. :lol:
Fair Lady,
Thank you for these comments...I treasure the sincere compliments of a Lady.
John/IBOB :waving:
Quote from: sunlight on November 18, 2010, 06:54:31 AM
Dear Newsman...
I don't care what they say, I still think you are an awesome dude, and one of the best examples of a Gentleman that I have seen in a long time! Thank you for being who you are! :grin: Even if it means you pick on me at times, I know that you are not malicious in your teasing.
You have made my day brighter many times from the Yankee Bear series, and even the investigations.
Thank you for being you!
~ Chel
Newsman overexposed? :o
:anon:
Quote from: five-oh on November 18, 2010, 02:04:00 PM
Quote from: sunlight on November 18, 2010, 01:27:13 PM
Hmm... One thing I learned in photography is that once an image is exposed... to bring more light to the subject creates problems with overexposure, and causes the image to appear unlike the original- so much so, you can't see what it really is in the rendition that you create.
:grin: I will leave you to ponder if this comment is related or not. :evilgrin:
Now you've got me worried. :lol: What kind of evil Frankenstein will Newsman morph into? And will everyone blame me? (probably). Will Scott banish me for overexposing John? Hmmm.... Things to ponder. :lol:
I think it is more like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde... :hypocrite:
Quote from: YooperYankDude on November 18, 2010, 06:31:10 AM
Quote from: upcchris on November 18, 2010, 06:19:27 AM
:lol: You better hope Sis doesn't know who Morla, the ancient one is or we might both get clobbered! :couch:
:laughhard: Ahh... nonsense! I would just call Falkor to come rescue us! But don't expect me to sing "A Whole New World" to you as we fly away... It is way to high of a key for my Bass voice! :biglaugh:
you'd be more likely sing the Neverending Story theme by Limahl...but that's even higher... :sing:
Overexposure :nono: be careful what you ask...because once you learn a fact it is nearly impssible to unlearn it...no matter how much you may want to...there's no danger of overexposure if you phrase your questions right...
Re: Newsman and five-oh...which one is Jekyll and which one is Hyde? :couch:
Well, Thanksgiving has passed and the holiday break is over. Before going any further in this investigation, I would like to publically give thanks- to THE DEFENDANT for giving me so much evidence of his true nature. :biglaugh:
Having said that, I feel that it is time to get back to work, so here we go... :thumbsup2:
In October of 07, THE DEFENDANT admits that he is attempting to avoid any detection by boasting that "..I memorize a lot of things..less incriminating evidence lying around, ya know?" This plainly shows, once again, his willful intent of concealing his true nature.
In April of 2008, THE DEFENDANT shows that true friendship means little to him when he offers to accept applications for Nwlife a potential spouse- and admits that he plans to "... process the applications, and promise not to skim off for my own use more than three applications per week."
Not only does this show his disdain for friendship, but marks him as a "PLAYA"-three applications (and potential dates) a week?!? :roll:
However, in THE DEFENDANT (AKA BIGDADDY)'S favor,it was decided in another thread that he would make a good father- possibly a good thing, being the playa that he seems to be. :laughhard:
And, as further proof of his "playahood" I offer this statement- " ...If the kissing is done properly, that should, of course, also take care of the touching the shoulder and running the fingers through the woman's hair, all at the same time!"
It was difficult to stay focused once I found the GP meetup thread. There were so many pieces of evidence that it was impossible to keep track of them all, so I'll just post a few here and let you draw your own conclusions,i.e.
"Oh, and the stroll down a country lane in the dark Thursday night with Lady Elona was something, as well! "
In reference to the "bustamove"... "However, she may have been more than a little traumatized by the site of a huge man wearing a Keebler hat advancing on her as she's trapped in a corner!"
admitting his playahood once more... " Better get that cough tended to, Lady Ash, or people will think you caught it from me, smooching at the meetup..."
hugging all available ladies present..."« on: July 01, 2008, 12:36:25 AM »
*Hugs Lady Elona*
*Hugs Lady Ash*
*Hugs Lady Chel*
*Hugs Lady Wooby*
*Hugs Lady Sandra*
*Hugs Lady Ash again*" - fickle playa, from Lady Elona to Lady Ash-twice! :o
After careful review, I feel that the evidence that has been presented is more than enough to prove that THE DEFENDANT is, as has been previously stated, a snake in the grass hiding his true colors. Those colors being that he is a playa that crushes innocent ladies' hopes and dreams and will misquote innocent folk at will if it will further his personal agenda. :lol:
I would request that you, the jury, go easy on THE DEFENDANT, as during the investigation, I discovered a previously unknown (to me) truth- Despite all evidence notwithstanding, THE DEFENDANT seems to be a big teddy bear with an unusual tender streak towards children. Therefore, he cannot be all bad. In view of this, should you the jury decide to simply find him guilty of misrepresentation and being sneaky, the prosecution would feel vindicated. I would suggest that, in the spirit of the holidays, he be simply given probation.
This investigation, I feel, has shown THE DEFENDANT that he will be watched, and therefore should serve as a deterrant for any future missteps that he might make. :nono: In light of this, no matter your decision, dear jury, the prosecution feels this to have been a worthwhile endeavor. Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, THE PROSECUTION RESTS.
Sincerely, "five-oh", underpaid, overworked guardian of truth and justice. :waving: :waving:
And so the clock begins. I will begin putting thoughts to notes as to me defense. As the persecution took some added time, I reserve the right to do the same.
I may also post in phases, as the persecution has.
I Remain,
John/Newsman :waving:
Grumpyest of the Grumpye
Champion of the Elder Bachelors Council
Innocent Bachelor of Broadcasting
LOL! Good Job BOB!
Quote from: Newsman on November 28, 2010, 05:16:32 AM
And so the clock begins. I will begin putting thoughts to notes as to me defense. As the persecution took some added time, I reserve the right to do the same.
I may also post in phases, as the persecution has.
I Remain,
John/Newsman :waving:
Grumpyest of the Grumpye
Champion of the Elder Bachelors Council
Innocent Bachelor of Broadcasting
LOL! Yay... this keeps getting more interesting... lol!
Greetings Unto the members of this website!
This is the first installment of my defense against accusations raised by one 'Five-oh", self-styled prosecutor and investigator in a case against your longtime Chef Investigator.
In my initial notice, I posted I would;
"*awaits the end of the alleged prosecutor's case, and respondent will argue venue, jurisdiction, conflict of interest, abuse of authority under color, of law, conspiracy, prosecutorial misconduct, and more, specifically related to one "five-oh', address other co-conspirators, request indictments against all of same, and refute unfounded charges against respondent, with such response being filed in the court of public opinion within a fortnight of when five-oh (and his silent co-conspirators) announces he rests what he laughingly has called his 'case'*"
Thus, in order, we begin the respondent's arguement
+ Venue: The place for this case has been put before the members of this website, but five-oh has already been deserted those he purports to care for: recall his statement "
"I would request that you, the jury, go easy on THE DEFENDANT, as during the investigation, I discovered a previously unknown (to me) truth- Despite all evidence notwithstanding, THE DEFENDANT seems to be a big teddy bear with an unusual tender streak towards children. Therefore, he cannot be all bad. In view of this, should you the jury decide to simply find him guilty of misrepresentation and being sneaky, the prosecution would feel vindicated. I would suggest that, in the spirit of the holidays, he be simply given probation."
Yet, earlier in the same thread, we see where he has written regarding Scott: "after all, you're actually the only one I have to convince"
This, from one who describes himself as an "underpaid, overworked guardian of truth and justice"
This, from a man who purports to be a presenter of fact?
Much more to follow
John/Newsman
Grumpyest of the Grumpye
Champion of the Elder Bachelors Council
Innocent Bacheklor of Broadcasting
LOL! * five-oh bites tongue and awaits patiently for rebuttal opportunity *
Quote from: five-oh on November 30, 2010, 02:12:12 AM
LOL! * five-oh bites tongue and awaits patiently for rebuttal opportunity *
LOL
Good intro John... lol
Hmmmm..... Let's just bump this to the top to *remind* a certain defendant that he is still being watched - even though his posting has slowed as of late. :hypocrite:
(We do miss your witty comments, Sir John.)
:cophat:
Quote from: five-oh on January 17, 2011, 03:05:44 PM
Hmmmm..... Let's just bump this to the top to *remind* a certain defendant that he is still being watched - even though his posting has slowed as of late. :hypocrite:
(We do miss your witty comments, Sir John.)
:cophat:
Defendant?!? Have you rested? :lol:
How in the world did I miss this thread?!?! This is awesome! I guess Roscoe will have to fight the "blue cyclone" on his own...lol
Nay, I have not! Perchance I'm just waiting for you to build up as many posts for me to base my response off of as you had of mine to dig false accusations from!
Actually, I need two or three days when I'm doing minimal stuff to research and flesh out, then write up my response.
John :waving:
Excuses, excuses, you hear them every day... :biglaugh:
What's that verse? "He who holds the feet of others to the fire, to the fire his own shall be held" or something like that...
Quote from: Newsman on June 05, 2011, 04:41:31 AM
Nay, I have not! Perchance I'm just waiting for you to build up as many posts for me to base my response off of as you had of mine to dig false accusations from!
Actually, I need two or three days when I'm doing minimal stuff to research and flesh out, then write up my response.
John :waving:
:laughhard: You'll be waiting a while....
Quote from: minnesota68 on June 05, 2011, 03:29:00 AM
How in the world did I miss this thread?!?! This is awesome! I guess Roscoe will have to fight the "blue cyclone" on his own...lol
Gee, thanks, Mini. Ya coulda jumped in here and helped. Let me guess, when you slammed the door "it musta broke something 'cause the door locks jammed..." :laughhard:
* Kmymbir slides into a chair next to MelodyB & rWooby.